684 So. 2d 526 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Dorthey · State v. Sepulvado · 573 So. 2d 528 - State v. Benjamin · 484 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fraser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of the law is justice, which can be served only when the various components of the system are thoughtfully working in concert towards that end. When the system grinds routinely without each component individualizing each case, the general rules can produce the occasional unjust result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shoplifting a pair of inexpensive tennis shoes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.