684 So. 2d 856 - Rushing v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · State v. Cogswell · 439 So. 2d 828 - Nikolic v. State · 111 So. 2d 459 - Davis v. State · State v. Escobedo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant's [false] signature on a traffic ticket ... would be forgery.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“signing another's name to a traffic citation does constitute the offense of forgery.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hoever falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits a ... promissory note, or an order, acquittance, or discharge for money or other property, or an acceptance of a bill of exchange or promissory note for the payment of money, or any receipt for money, goods or other property... with intent to injure or defraud any person, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Watkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.