Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 S.W.2d 110 - Patterson v. State

Patterson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2000

8 state decisions

50198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Henderson · Ray v. State · 4 Tenn. Crim. App. 86 - Beaty v. Neil

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) An appeal lies from any order or judgment in a criminal proceeding where the law provides for such appeal, and from any judgment of conviction: (2) Upon a plea of guilty or nolo con-tendere if: (i) Defendant entered into a plea agreement under Rule 11(e) but explicitly reserved with the consent of the state and of the court the right to appeal a certified question of law that is dispositive of the case; or (ii) Defendant seeks review of the sentence set and there was no plea agreement under Rule 11(e); or (iii) The error(s) complained of were not waived as a matter of law by the plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or otherwise waived, and if such errors are apparent from the record of the proceedings already had; or (iv) Defendant explicitly reserved with the consent of the court the right to appeal a certified question of law that is dispositive of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.