Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 SW2D 520 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2002

23 state decisions

170198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holloway v. Arkansas · Brower v. United States · Hemphill v. State · Love v. State · Williamson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ppellant must show that the witness’s testimony would have proven helpful to the appellant. This appellant has failed to show what the substance of [this witness’s] testimony would have been and how it would have aided his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.