Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 SW2D 81 - Baker v. Armco, Inc.

Baker v. Armco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co. · Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co. · Marie v. Standard Steel Works · STATE EX REL. ETC. v. Ferriss · Best v. Schoemehl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permits recovery in some circumstances over and above the statutory benefits provided by the Workers’ Compensation law. If the employer designs, manufactures, distributes a defective product and places it in commerce and a third party places said machine into use at the employer’s business and an employee is injured, he may recover under Workers’ Compensation and sue for additional damages under tort law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.