Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 A.2d 423 - State v. Chapman

State v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
7
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2014

8 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. Youngblood · Gryger v. Burke · State v. Vainio · State v. Joubert · State v. Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[dlefendant's due process claim fails [because alfter the effective date of the amendment [to the DUI law], defendant had fair notice that a conviction for operating under the influence would subject her to the currently defined penalty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.