Hunt v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
685 F.2d 121 · 1982
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2015
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Califano v. Yamasaki · Teague v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that the 60-day requirement for bringing an action under Sec. 205(g) of the Social Security Act is jurisdictional, not a statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Triplett v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.