Day v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
685 F.2d 19 · 1982
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Schweiker v. Hansen · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · White v. Mathews · Wright v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All present and future Vermont residents seeking to secure Social Security disability benefits who, following an initial determination by the defendant that no disability exists, experience an unreasonable delay in the scheduling of and/or issuance of decisions in reconsiderations and fair hearings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Heckler v. Day · Barnett v. Bowen“[o]ur case involves neither estoppel nor a deficiency on the part of the claimant .... [T]he interim payments at issue here flow from the district court’s inherent powers to fashion a remedy, see Caswell, 583 F.2d at 17 , and cases there cited, and not from an estoppel that prevents the government from raising a defense. 685 F.2d at 24 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“exclud[e] the possibility of interim payments ordered by a court exercising its remedial power”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.