Cuesta La Honda Guild v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
685 F.2d 324 · 1982
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Saraw Partnership v. United States (1995), Frigard v. United States (1988)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Neustadt · Walter v. United States · Neal v. Bergland · Ware v. United States · Ramirez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Government is liable for injuries resulting from negligence in performance of operational tasks even though misrepresentations are collaterally involved. It is not liable, however, for injuries resulting from commercial decisions made in reliance on government misrepresentations.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b) of this title shall not apply to ... (h) Any claim arising out of ... misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“surveyed possible [dam] sites, performed foundation analyses, ... prepared a topographic survey, ... recommended a site for [a] dam and reservoir, ... design[ed] ... the dam and reservoir,] and prepared construction plans and specifications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.