Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 F.2d 60 - Rutherford v. Schweiker

Rutherford v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

685 F.2d 60 · 1982

Citation profile

164
cited by 164 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 164 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Mongeur v. Heckler (1983), Dumas v. Schweiker (1983)

9 federal appellate · 7 district ·

6601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Underwood v. Ribicoff · Marcus v. Califano · Bastien v. Califano · DePaepe v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 164 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress has instructed us that the factual findings of the Secretary, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive. We would be derelict in our duties if we simply paid lip service to this rule, while shaping our holding to conform to our own interpretation of the evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Congress has instructed ... that the factual findings of the Secretary, 5 if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]f there is a continuing interrelationship between the excess consumption of alcohol and the disability, such that termination of the former will end the latter, the issue for the Secretary is whether the claimant has lost the voluntary ability to control his drinking.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.