Johnson v. Arkema, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
685 F.3d 452 · 2012
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi AB
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the theory or technique has been tested; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error of the method used and the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique's operation; and (4) whether the theory or method has been generally accepted by the scientific community.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“be grounded in the methods and procedures of science and ... be more than unsupported speculation or subjective belief.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.