United States v. Stock’s Empirical Analysis
685 F.3d 621 · 2012
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2242 · 18 U.S.C. § 2246 · 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 42 U.S.C. § 16911 · 42 U.S.C. § 16913 · 42 U.S.C. § 16917
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Gall v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Smith v. Doe · Lambert v. People of the State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Base Offense Level (apply the greatest): (1) 16, if the defendant was required to register as a Tier III offender; (2) 14, if the defendant was required to register as a Tier II offender; or (3) 12, if the defendant was required to register as a Tier I offender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.