¶1 After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. We have considered all of John Goodrich and Jerald Watson’s specifications of error, reviewing de novo the following:
1. Whether the district court erred in denying Watson and Goodrich qualified immunity on Robert Wright’s Fourth Amendment claim?
2. Whether the district court erred in in denying Watson and Goodrich official immunity on Robert Wright’s parallel state law claim?
¶2 The decision of the district court is
¶3 AFFIRMED.