Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 FSUPP 462 - Capriotti v. Bunnell

Capriotti v. Bunnell’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Equimark Commercial Finance Company v. C.I.T. Financial Services Corporation (Formerly Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation) · Rivera v. PHILADELPHIA THEOLOGICAL SEM. · Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as specifically recognized or provided in section 6 of this act, an owner of land owes no duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for recreational purposes, or to give any warning of a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity on such premises to persons entering for such purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.