Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 FSUPP 821 - Wilcox v. Precision Parachute Co.

Wilcox v. Precision Parachute Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Stuart v. Spademan · Behagen v. Amateur Basketball Ass'n · Rambo v. American Southern Insurance · Lakota Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Havey Fund-Raising Management, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the person’s control over the corporation is such that the corporation is really acting as his agent in doing the acts giving rise to the suit, then he can be reached through the long-arm statute even though he personally had no contact with the forum state. The courts speak in terms of “piercing the corporate veil” or the “alter ego” doctrine in discussing the susceptibility of individuals to long-arm jurisdiction. Not all cases treat the question in terms of those doctrines drawn from corporation law, however, (footnotes omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.