Franklin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Joe v. Lebow · Capes v. State · Franklin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the amendment to the post-conviction home detention statute evinces legislative intent that credit time [i.e., credit for time served] can no longer be awarded to pretrial home detainees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A person ... earns one (1) day of credit time for each day he is imprisoned for a crime or confined awaiting trial or sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Molden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.