Mitchell v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Sprague · Wernke v. Halas · Kikkert v. Krumm · Mullins v. State · Campins v. Capels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Concerned with the danger of exaggerated sentimentality, the [Campins] court stated that it was 'referring to the feelings generated by items of almost purely sentimental value such as heirlooms, family papers and photographs, ..'" Mitchell, 685 N.E.2d at 1088 (quoting Caompins, 461 N.E.2d at 721 (citations omitted)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lachenman v. Stice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.