In Re Wren’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. · Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services · Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp. · Brandt v. Hallwood Management Co. · Fiveland v. Bollig & Sons, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In January 1999, the HRA contracted with CSM Properties, Inc. to redevelop the area with a mixture of residential, retail, and office structures. By letter, the HRA informed area property owners about the contract and that there would be a process to address property-owner inquiries about”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Wren“responsible for all acquisition costs and the cost of relocation benefits and assistance provided to any party displaced as a result of the development.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Wren“no power to possess the hotel or to use it for its own purposes,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Wren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.