Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 P2D 1267 - Fox v. State

Fox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Benjamin v. United States · Kilcullen v. United States · United States v. Schwartz · United States v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subject to constitutional limitations failure to raise at the omnibus hearing any pre-trial trial error or issue, other than the failure of the indictment to show jurisdiction or to charge an offense, constitutes waiver of such error or issue unless the party concerned does not then possess the information necessary to raise it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Motion Date. At the time of the arraignment or as soon thereafter as practicable, the court shall set a time for the making of pretrial motions. In the event that additional time is required for hearing the pre-trial motions, the remaining motions shall be processed during the omnibus hearing....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “encouraged trial [courts] to rely on the use of monetary sanctions as the preferred means of assuring compliance with court rules and orders governing procedural matters.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.