Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 P2D 405 - United States v. Malinka

United States v. Malinka’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co. · Foster v. Marshall · Adams v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he mortgagee of real estate subject to forfeiture for the owner’s failure to pay real estate ad valorem taxes is entitled to actual notice before its constitutionally protected interests in the real estate can be terminated. Mennonite clearly places the onus on the State to provide actual notice to the mortgagee where the mortgagee’s identity can be reasonably discovered, notwithstanding that the mortgagee might take certain steps to protect its own interest. [Footnote omitted; emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.