Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 So. 2d 1277 - Roberts v. State

685 So. 2d 1277 - Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2015

3 state decisions

10199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 671 So. 2d 149 - Acosta v. Richter · 634 So. 2d 1103 - Jackson v. State · 464 So. 2d 684 - State v. Rice · 582 So. 2d 820 - Eddy v. Napier · Roberts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a settled principle of statutory construction that phrases within a statute are not to be read in isolation, but rather should be construed within the context of the entire section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.