Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

685 So. 2d 27

Castro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-11-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2009

6 state decisions

Relies on Melbourne v. State · Royster v. State · 679 So. 2d 1183 - Ratliff v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s three convictions under section 316.193(3)(c)l, Florida Statutes (1993). State v. Salazar, 679 So.2d 1183, (Fla. 1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, (Fla. 1996). We reverse that portion of the written order' of probation which indicates that appellant may perform community service in lieu of costs of supervision. E.g., Royster v. State, 657 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the entry of an amended order of probation.

GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/685/so2d/27 · .json · Public domain