Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 So. 2d 346 - State v. Carter

685 So. 2d 346 - State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 953 So. 2d 890 - State v. Lathan (2007), 703 So. 2d 63 - State v. Winfrey (1997)

68 state decisions

290199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Washington v. Texas · State v. Smith · 643 So. 2d 1289 - State v. Kershaw · 595 So. 2d 1135 - State v. Mosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “after the judgment of conviction and sentence has become final....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the judge, district attorney, or a court official, during the trial or in argument, refers directly or indirectly to: *#**:{:* (2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible; ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ An admonition to the jury to disregard the remark or comment shall not be sufficient to prevent a mistrial. If the defendant, however, requests that only an admonition be given, the court shall admonish the jury to disregard the remark or comment but shall not declare a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.