Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 So. 2d 473 - Patterson v. State

685 So. 2d 473 - Patterson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2015

9 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 620 So. 2d 1149 - Hunter v. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. · Paxton v. Ballard · Scott v. Behrman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be [.^raised in answer is sensible and laudable. Because affirmative defenses raise matters for judicial resolution outside of issues raised by plaintiffs petition, plaintiff must be made aware of these matters at an early stage so that plaintiff can prepare an opposition to the defense and adjust his case, if necessary, in light of the new facts and issues raised by the affirmative defense. If the affirmative defense is allowed despite the defense not being raised in answer, the result is a surprise “trial by ambush” that unfairly aids the defendant, who knew about the defense even though plaintiff was kept in ignorance of the defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The policy behind [La.Code Civ.P. art. 1005] is the prevention of `trial by ambush.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.