Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

685 So. 2d 62

Simonetta v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-12-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, and the sentence imposed. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant’s probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant’s probation, and specifying the condition of probation found to have been violated. Appellant need not be present.

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
/685/so2d/62 · .json · Public domain