Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 So. 2d 715 - Yates v. State

685 So. 2d 715 - Yates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably State v. Fulminante (1999), 748 So. 2d 771 - Wade v. State (1999)

47 state decisions

250199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. State of Arkansas · Parham v. J. L. · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State · 337 So. 2d 1242 - Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bodily injury which creates a substantial risk of death or which causes serious, permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In considering a motion for directed verdict, the reviewing court must consider evidence introduced in light most favorable to State, accepting all evidence introduced by the State as true, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom; if there is sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict, motion for directed verdict must be overruled.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[o]ur concern here is whether the evidence in the record is sufficient to sustain a finding adverse to [the defendant] on each element of the offense ... [W]ith respect to each element, of the offense, [we must] consider all of the evidence—not just the evidence which supports the case for the prosecution—in light most favorable to the verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.