Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

685 So. 2d 90

Rustom v. Sparling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 2, 1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-01-02

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2017

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-01-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse and remand that portion of the final judgment entered by the trial court, which finds certain notes and the mortgage prepared by the husband in favor of his father, a non-party, to be invalid. The trial court may not adjudicate the rights of a non-party.

¶2We affirm the final judgment in all other respects, and specifically affirm that portion ordering the husband to clear' the title of the subject property or to bear the fees and costs in the event the wife is required to clear the title.

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
/685/so2d/90 · .json · Public domain