Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 SW2D 356 - Turner v. Lutz

Turner v. Lutz’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Holley v. Adams · In the Interest of G. M. · Wiley v. Spratlan · State v. Addington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once made the decision of the trial court will not be disturbed unless it appears from the record that there was an abuse of discretion. Normally, as a corollary to this rule of broad discretion, it would matter not what this Court might have done under the circumstances had we heard the evidence; we would only be permitted to determine whether such broad discretion had been abused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.