Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 685 SW2D 876 - In re J.D.K.

In re J.D.K.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Murphy v. Carron · In Re Sedillo · Grissum v. Reesman · Matter of O'Brien

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““For evidence to be clear and convincing, it must instantly tilt the scales in the affirmative when weighed against the evidence in opposition and the fact finder’s mind is left with an abiding conviction that the evidence is true.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.