Williams v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2010
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Francis v. Franklin · Gordon v. United States · In re Disbarment of Sabiston · United States v. Smith · Carter v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appellant was entitled to have the inconsistent statements introduced into evidence so the jury could decide for itself exactly how much `impeaching weight and significance' to give to these statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“By not allowing the jurors to review the statements, the trial court impeded their ability to perform the task assigned to them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“urged the jury to evaluate the importance (or lack thereof) of the statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.