Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 F.2d 1210 - Pielet v. Pielet

Pielet v. Pielet’s Empirical Analysis

686 F.2d 1210 · 1982

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Central Progressive Bank v. Fireman's Fund Insurance · Hyde v. Land-of-Sky Regional Council · Cote v. Estate of Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mr. Foote: Well Your Honor, if the jury in response to this interrogatory answers it “No”, meaning they were not prohibited, do I understand then that that ends this entire case, other than Your Honor entering judgment on the issues in this case? The Court: That’s what I said. Mr. Foote: Let me talk to Mr. Wendrow. Mr. Foote: Very well Your Honor. The Court: All right. Mr. Foote: You have my agreement. The Court: Well, I think that we have, —I think that we have everything now agreed upon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to appeal a special interrogatory submitted to the jury under Rule 49(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ... a party must make a specific objection to the proposed interrogatory ... prior to the retiring of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]f the trial court 'omits any issue of fact raised by the pleadings or by the evidence' ... each party waives the right to a jury trial of the omitted issue unless he demands its submission before the jury retires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.