Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 F.2d 276 - Wyatt v. Kaplan

Wyatt v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis

686 F.2d 276 · 1982

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
6
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 9 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Alioto (1994), Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie (1994)

49 federal appellate · 9 district · 7 state decisions

45019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Milliken v. Meyer · Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. · Desist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an appropriate case, we will not hesitate to reverse a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, on the ground that the plaintiff was improperly denied discovery.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “establish personal jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence; prima facie evidence of personal jurisdiction is sufficient”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “will not be disturbed ordinarily unless there are unusual circumstances showing a clear abuse.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.