Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
686 F.2d 708 · 1982
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 832 · 16 U.S.C. § 832C · 43 U.S.C. § 375A · 43 U.S.C. § 485H · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Zuber v. Allen · United States v. Rutherford · Williams v. United States · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]uits to challenge ... final actions ... taken pursuant to [the Act] ... shall be filed in the United States court of appeals for the region.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Only if BPA's interpretation is unreasonable [should the court] conclude that BPA's contract offers violate the [Regional] Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provide a portion of the Administrator's reserves for firm power loads within the region.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.