Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters’s Empirical Analysis
686 F.2d 720 · 1982
Citation profile
71 federal appellate · 10 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 130 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Clarke v. United States (1990), Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp. (1993)
71 federal appellate · 10 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Mayo v. United States · Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood County · Great Western Sugar Co. v. Nelson · Cover v. Schwartz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the consequences and attendant hardships of dismissal or refusal to dismiss.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[i]t would be quite destructive to the principle of judicial finality to put a litigant [dissatisfied with a trial court's findings] in a position to destroy the collateral conclusiveness of a judgment'”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is in no position to complain that [its] right of review of an adverse lower court judgment has been lost.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.