Haskell v. Harris

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2012.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2012-07-25

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2014

1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Eric Andrew Long, Esquire, Peter C. Meier, Esquire, Paul Hastings LLP, Michael Temple Risher, Staff, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

¶2Daniel Powell, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

¶3ORDER

¶4KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

¶5Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

¶6Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.