Latif v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
686 F.3d 1122 · 2012
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 114 · 49 U.S.C. § 44903 (Gerardo Hernandez Airport Security Act of 2015) · 49 U.S.C. § 46110 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Block v. Community Nutrition Institute · Webster v. Doe · Pegram v. Herdrich · Elgin v. Department of the Treasury · Clark v. Busey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because "TSC-not TSA-actually reviews the classified intelligence information about the travelers and decides whether to remove them from the List" and "established the policies governing that stage of the redress process," we agree that [the court of appeals] cannot, on section 46110 review, provide relief to an individual included ... in the [Watchlist] by "simply amending, modifying, or setting aside TSA's orders or by directing TSA to conduct further proceedings."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilwal v. Nielsen · Kovac v. Wray“TSC-not TSA-actually reviews the classified intelligence information about the travelers and decides whether to remove them from the List”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilwal v. Nielsen · Kovac v. Wray“established the policies governing that stage of the redress process,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilwal v. Nielsen · Kovac v. Wray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.