Reuter v. Cutcliff’s Empirical Analysis
686 F.3d 511 · 2012
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Field v. Mans · Raleigh v. Illinois Department of Revenue · Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · Strang v. Bradner · Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a partnership existed between [Nathan] Reuter and [Daryl] Brown,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cutcliff v. Reuter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.