Annachamy v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
686 F.3d 729 · 2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Russello v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1)the number of individuals subject to removal from the United States for having provided material support to a terrorist group who allege that such support was provided under duress; (2) a breakdown of the types of terrorist organizations to which the individuals described in paragraph (1) have provided material support; (3) a description' of the factors that the Department of Homeland Security considers when evaluating duress waivers; and (4) any other information that the Secretary believes that the Congress should consider while overseeing the Department’s application of duress waivers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Annachamy v. Holder“determine ... that subsection (a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of this section [defining Tier III terrorist organizations] shall not apply to a group within the scope of that subsection” (emphasis added)). The exception does not apply to the Secretaries' authority to “determine ... that subsection (a)(3)(B) of this section [which includes the material support bar] shall not apply with respect to an alien within the scope of that subsection.” Id. (emphasis added). 12 . The persecutor bar states:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Annachamy v. Holder“committing] an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit, false documentation or identification, weapons (including chemical, biological, or radiological weapons), explosives, or training — ... (cc) to a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi) or to any member of such an organization^]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.