Friedman v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
686 F.3d 813 · 2012
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1121 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128a of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 559 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [agency's] decision ... was arbitrary and capricious with respect to [the determination at issue] because it failed to explain its departure from the agency's own precedents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the regulations elsewhere distinguish between 'acts' and 'omissions,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'ordinary meaning of [which] is a broad one-”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. People v. Crouse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.