Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 FAPPX 590 - Farris v. Burton

Farris v. Burton’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Nesses v. Shepard · PJ v. Wagner · Campbell v. City of Spencer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Hazel-Atlas decision relates solely to the issue of fraud committed in a federal court and that court's power to remedy it; the decision says nothing about the jurisdiction of a federal court to address fraud allegedly committed in a state court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[T]he type of judicial action barred by Rooker-Feldman consists of a review of the proceedings already conducted by the [state] tribunal to determine whether it reached its result in accordance with law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “allegations concerning the state-court proceedings or judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.