De Cuellar v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 1702 · 50 U.S.C. § 4301
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Fernandez · Parker v. Bowen · Real v. Simon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“involve property in which a foreign country designated under this part, or any national thereof, has at any time on or since the effective date of this section had any interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. De Cuellar v. Brady“requires an unduly restrictive definition of the term ... and does not comport with the spirit of the indenture contract or the legal rights of a holder of bearer bonds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. De Cuellar v. Brady“[t]he plain words of section 515.524 belie [this] contention.... The sinking fund clearly meets the qualification of a trust administered in the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. De Cuellar v. Brady
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.