Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2676
Relies on Engstrom v. State · Serra v. Pichardo · Arevalo v. Woods · State v. Albrecht · Griffin Pipe Products Co. v. Guarino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ur goal is to determine the intent of the law, gleaned generally from the statutory language. We also consider the statute's "subject matter, the object sought to be accomplished, the purpose to be served, underlying policies, remedies provided, and the consequences of the various interpretations."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(citations omitted)). Having determined that the trust at issue was a discretionary support trust, we must next determine whether Lois's interest in the discretionary support trust is the kind of interest encompassed by section 249A.5(2)( c ). In construing a statute, [o]ur goal is to determine the intent of the law, gleaned generally from the statutory language. We also consider the statute's”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Barkema Trust
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.