Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 So. 2d 1021 - State v. Hampton

686 So. 2d 1021 - State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Anders v. California · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.