Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 So. 2d 1048 - State v. Morgan

686 So. 2d 1048 - State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 660 So. 2d 1189 - State Ex Rel. Glover v. State · Weaver v. Graham · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · State v. Ferrie · 367 So. 2d 283 - State Ex Rel. Bickman v. Dees

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he enhancement of the penalty for habitual offenders convicted of a new felony only addresses itself to the sentencing powers of the trial judge after conviction and has no functional relationship to the innocence or guilt of the instant crime. In other words, it is clear that the sentence in such cases is for the new crime only; it is simply more severe if the defendant is a habitual offender. State v. Walker, 416 So.2d 534, 536 (La.1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.