686 So. 2d 1053 - State v. Bishop’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 454 So. 2d 93 - State v. Nuccio · 654 So. 2d 440 - State v. Linson · State v. Payne · Lewis v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections · State v. Soco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Concerning the merits of defendant's appeal, we note the trial court erred in requiring defendant to register as a sex offender under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 15:542 that were not in effect at the time the offense was committed. This violates the constitutional prohibition on ex post facto application of laws”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.