686 So. 2d 107 - State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2014
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 416 So. 2d 82 - State Ex Rel. LaFleur v. Donnelly · State v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“B. Limited applicability. Except as otherwise provided by Article 1101(A)(2) and other legislation, in the following proceedings, the principles underlying this Code shall serve as guides to the admissibility of evidence. The specific exclusionary rules and other provisions, however, shall be applied only to the extent that they tend to promote the purposes of the proceeding. (1) Worker’s Compensation cases. (2) Child custody cases. (3) Revocation of probation hearings. (4) Preliminary examination in criminal cases, and the court may consider evidence that would otherwise be barred by the hearsay rule. C. Rules inapplicable. Except as otherwise provided by Article 1101(A)(2) and other legislation, the provisions of this Code shall not apply to the following: (1) The determination of questions of fact preliminary to admissibility of evidence when the issue is to be determined by Article 104. (2) Proceedings with respect to release on bail. (3) Disposition hearings in juvenile cases. (4) Sentencing hearings except as provided in Code of Criminal Procedure Article 905.2 in capital cases. D. Discretional applicability. Notwithstanding the limitations on the applicability of this Code stated in Paragraphs A, B and C of this Article, in all judicial proceedings a court may rely upon the provisions of this Code with respect to judicial notice, authentication and identification, and proof of contents of writings, recordings, and photographs as a basis for admitting evidence or making”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rochelle“the rules of evidence are relaxed in probation revocation proceedings;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Black
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.