Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 So. 2d 1071 - Caples v. Caples

686 So. 2d 1071 - Caples v. Caples’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · 453 So. 2d 1294 - Tucker v. Tucker · 622 So. 2d 1264 - Ash v. Ash · Smith v. Jones · Morrow v. Morrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]pon the filing of any action or matter listed in [Rule 81(d)(2)], summons shall issue commanding the defendant or respondent to appear and defend at a time and place, either in term time or vacation, at which the same shall be heard. Said time and place shall be set by special order, general order or rule of the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he proper procedure under Rule 81 would have been to serve [the respondent] an additional Rule 81 summons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “would have outlined the time and date for the trial court hearing and informed [the respondent].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.