Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

686 So. 2d 11

Henke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-05-01

Relies on Nank v. State · 648 So. 2d 308 - Luby v. State

Decided 1996-05-01

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from *12condition 10. Luhy v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

¶2Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
/686/so2d/11 · .json · Public domain