Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 So. 2d 1290 - James v. State

686 So. 2d 1290 - James v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Moody v. Daggett · Alford v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`All that is required of the trial judge in a probation revocation hearing is that the court be reasonably satisfied therefrom of the truth of the charge.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As one might expect, courts have reached widely varying conclusions on when Morrissey requires the final hearing to be held.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.