Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

686 So. 2d 17

Alamo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-06-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1997

2 state decisions

Relies on 547 So. 2d 925 - State v. Green · Becton v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-06-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Miriam Alamo challenges the denial of her motion to correct illegal sentence brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging she is entitled to credit pursuant to State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989). The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute the issue raised by Alamo.

¶2Accordingly we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which refute Alamo’s claim. See Becton v. State, 668 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

¶3Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
/686/so2d/17 · .json · Public domain